what the FUCK? <---
Aug. 3rd, 2007 05:03 amfucking hell, LJ's doing it again.
My god, how could they ban Ponderosa?
update: posts from elaboration
and Ponderosa121 with the pics they were banned for (neither appears to be extremely underage, if at all)
What an outrage, seriously. (Not only this, they're making it harder to get a headcount via the new policy)
keep posted at FANDOMTOSSED at GJ
this is LJ's official stance:
lj_biz post details it
CLARIFICATION: Not all content describing underage sexuality is in violation of our policies (or of United States law). Rather, using LJ to distribute "obscene" content (as defined by the Miller Test) is illegal. If it qualifies as obscene, and if it involves minors (people under the age of 18), then it's not allowed.
So basically, even a transcript of Dawson's Creek could get you banned? THEY WERE UNDERAGE AND THEY MADE OUT OH MY GOD NO.
As for me? 99% of what I write is barely G. Still, all writing is going to my FF.net account, the porn to my shiny new AFF.net account.
...I never thought I'd see the day was ff.net was more reasonable than LJ. Seriously.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go check through my fic.
My god, how could they ban Ponderosa?
update: posts from elaboration
and Ponderosa121 with the pics they were banned for (neither appears to be extremely underage, if at all)
What an outrage, seriously. (Not only this, they're making it harder to get a headcount via the new policy)
keep posted at FANDOMTOSSED at GJ
this is LJ's official stance:
lj_biz post details it
CLARIFICATION: Not all content describing underage sexuality is in violation of our policies (or of United States law). Rather, using LJ to distribute "obscene" content (as defined by the Miller Test) is illegal. If it qualifies as obscene, and if it involves minors (people under the age of 18), then it's not allowed.
So basically, even a transcript of Dawson's Creek could get you banned? THEY WERE UNDERAGE AND THEY MADE OUT OH MY GOD NO.
As for me? 99% of what I write is barely G. Still, all writing is going to my FF.net account, the porn to my shiny new AFF.net account.
...I never thought I'd see the day was ff.net was more reasonable than LJ. Seriously.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go check through my fic.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 03:12 pm (UTC)Actually, I feel bad because you're one of the people who really doesn't go for porn -- they're trying to make out most of us as freaky pedophiles, but by their standards, (18 only) most all of teen dramas would be banned oO
anyways! I hope it doesn't get that bad D': I'd miss poking around LJ with you ~
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 03:18 pm (UTC)Yeah, they do seem to be overlooking the bit where very few people are actually pedophiles. Most of them are women, ages 16 - 30, writing things they find cute or hot or fitting or hilarious or whatever. Just because we write about boys liking boys, sometimes underage, doesn't mean that we are about to start molesting children. Slightly different thing! Besides, were I suddenly to write porn about teenage girls, I wouldn't be a pedophile at all. I AM A TEENAGE GIRL. What the hell, LJ!
Same here. D: Silly SixApart.
♥
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 06:13 pm (UTC)...And this is why I have a GJ. -sighs-
I hardly ever write things under PG-13. And no, I do not care if they are over the legal age of sixteen. Frankly, I think I might soon become one of the many who make a permanent exodus over to GJ.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 11:53 am (UTC)|On another note. Sunao! ♥